WEEK 13
The semester flew by. It is already the end. Here is the data that I gathered from this experiment.
|
Inputs |
Incognito / Normal mode |
Before / After search |
Number of
relevant videos |
Percentage
of relevant videos |
|
Cooking |
Incognito |
Before |
6 |
5.0% |
|
Incognito |
After |
118 |
98.3% |
|
|
Flying |
Incognito |
Before |
3 |
2.5% |
|
Incognito |
After |
117 |
97.5% |
|
|
Normal |
Before |
2 |
3.3% |
|
|
Normal |
After |
58 |
96.6% |
|
|
Reading |
Incognito |
Before |
0 |
0.0% |
|
Incognito |
After |
114 |
95.0% |
|
|
Normal |
Before |
0 |
0.0% |
|
|
Normal |
After |
115 |
95.8% |
|
|
Sleeping |
Incognito |
Before |
1 |
0.8% |
|
Incognito |
After |
120 |
100.0% |
|
|
Normal |
Before |
2 |
1.7% |
|
|
Normal |
After |
120 |
100.0% |
Before putting the inputs onto a search
bar, the outputs with Incognito mode or without Incognito mode have very low
similarities to the inputs. After putting the inputs into the search bar, the outputs
with Incognito mode or without Incognito mode have a range between 95% and
100%. I expected I would see more related outputs to inputs before putting the
inputs as the experiment progressed. My hypothesis is that the outputs are more
influenced by arbitrary inputs in the YouTube algorithm as data sets are collected.
My hypothesis is not supported by the data. However, I think this hypothesis
may be supported with a different approach such as changing inputs, watching
certain videos, clicking certain things and so on. It was fun to do this
research and consider what would make the results different.

Comments
Post a Comment